|
(NaturalNews) For years, advocates of
natural health have been hammering away at the message
that soda causes diabetes and obesity. The soda
industry, meanwhile, has remained in denial mode,
mirroring the ridiculous position of the tobacco
industry that "nicotine is not addictive." Soda doesn't
cause diabetes, the industry claims, and it's perfectly
safe to consume in essentially unlimited quantities.
The Corn Refiners Association has joined the
denial with its own spin campaign that seeks to convince
people High-Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) is totally
natural and completely harmless. HFCS is, of course, the
primary sweetener used in sodas and soft drinks.
Now comes new research presented at the American Heart
Association's Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and
Prevention annual conference in San Francisco. This new
research reveals that over the last decade, soda
consumption has conservatively caused:
• 130,000 new cases of diabetes
• 14,000 new cases of heart disease
• 50,000 more "life years" with heart disease over the
last decade
"The finding suggests that any kind of policy that
reduces consumption might have a dramatic health
benefit," said senior study author Dr. Kirsten
Bibbins-Domingo (associate professor of medicine at the
University of California, San Francisco).
The American Beverage Association, meanwhile, says this
study hasn't been published in a peer-reviewed medical
journal yet and therefore it doesn't count. Soda
consumption doesn't cause diabetes or heart disease,
they claim, because "...both heart disease and diabetes
are complex conditions with no single cause and no
single solution."
It's silly logic, of course: Diabetes obviously has a
cause. It's not some spontaneous disease that
appears out of nowhere. And when you go looking for the
cause, you obviously have to look at dietary factors
since diabetes is a disease related to the consumption
and metabolism of dietary sugars. Once you do
that, sodas immediately raise a red flag because they're
liquid sugar in a highly-concentrated form that
does not exist naturally in nature.
HFCS doesn't grow on trees, in other words. Nature
provides sugars locked into insoluble fibers that slow
digestion and lower the effective glycemic index of
sugars that are consumed. In nature, sugars are always
combined with minerals, too, and many of those minerals
help prevent diabetes and heart disease. But
High-Fructose Corn Syrup is stripped of virtually all
those minerals. It contains no fiber and no healing
phytonutrients that you might encounter in plants. As a
result, HFCS -- sometimes dubbed "liquid Satan" -- might
be called a dietary poison that causes disease
while contributing to nutritional deficiencies that
accelerate disease.
Bone loss
Interestingly, this new study did not look at loss of
bone density, which is another side effect of
drinking soda. Due to the extremely high acidity of the
HFCS sweetener combined with the phosphoric acid used in
sodas, people who drink sodas often lose bone minerals
and end up being diagnosed with osteoporosis
(even at a relatively young age).
Other people end up with kidney stones due to all
these minerals passing through the kidneys and
contributing to the built up of mineral deposits there.
Long-term soda consumers may even suffer from
pancreatic cancer due to the extreme stress placed
on the pancreas following the consumption of liquid
sugars.
In all, soda consumption is linked to at least six
serious diseases:
#1) Diabetes
#2) Obesity
#3) Heart disease
#4) Cancer
#5) Osteoporosis
#6) Kidney stones
That's why taxing sodas is more than merely a way
to raise money through soda sales; it's also a way to
dramatically reduce the cost of treating these diseases.
It's no surprise that several U.S. states are now
starting to seriously consider slapping new taxes on
sodas and other "junk" beverages.
That's not the way I would prefer to see the situation
handled, actually. The better option, in my view, would
be to ban all soda advertising by effectively
stripping Free Speech rights from corporations. Such
rights belong only to individuals, not
multi-billion-dollar corporations. Corporations whose
products physically harm the health of the population at
large should not be allowed to openly advertise and
promote those products to the public. They can still
sell them, they just can't advertise them. |