|
| |
|
|
| |
Liberals Outraged By
White House Tactics In Health Debate |
|
| |
As the Senate races to pass a healthcare
reform bill before Christmas, media coverage is focusing on
criticism of the White House's approach to the debate –
criticism that is now coming from liberals in the President's
own party. The CBS Evening News (12/16, lead story, 3:10,
Cordes), in its lead story, described Democrats are "predictably
outraged" at Republican tactics, but added that "many Democrats
are even more frustrated with their own party and their
President for 'caving,' as they see it, to moderate demands that
the public option be removed from the bill." Rep. Anthony Weiner
(D-NY) said, "I don't think that I've ever seen a national
debate on a big issue like this where the President's kind of
sat back and said 'okay, whatever you guys decide up on Capitol
Hill, we're going to go with.'"
The
Washington Times (12/17, Miller) reports that "when Mr.
Obama this week gave tacit approval as Senate Democrats dropped
the 'public insurance' option from their healthcare bill and top
House Democrats fell in line, liberal lawmakers accused the
president of losing control of the debate." Rep. Weiner said,
"We need the president to stand up for the values our party
shares. We must stop letting the tail wag the dog of this
debate."
Howard Dean, in an op-ed in the
Washington Post (12/17),
writes, "If I were a senator, I would not vote for the current
healthcare bill. ... The legislation does have some good
points," but "I reluctantly conclude that, as it stands, this
bill would do more harm than good to the future of America." The
AP (12/17) reports that
speaking to reporters, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs
rejected a call by Howard Dean "to defeat the current Senate
healthcare bill." Dean "said the bill was an 'insurance
company's dream,'" but Gibbs retorted that if that's the case "I
don't think the insurance companies have gotten the memo."
Meanwhile,
The Hill (12/17, O'Brien,
subscription required) reports that "in a post to the official
White House blog, Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer took on
liberals' assertions that the Senate healthcare bill doesn't do
enough on healthcare reform and should be killed." The Hill adds
that "the blog is an unusual tack for Pfeiffer and the White
House, though. In recent days, Pfeiffer and other senior Obama
Administration officials have used the White House blog as a
platform to go after insurance companies and Republicans, not
fellow Democrats." Pfeiffer "defended the Senate's bill as a
'hugely successful' bid at expanding healthcare and making it
more affordable."
Politico (12/17, Gordon) reports that "more than anything
else in...Obama's presidency so far, health reform has exposed a
get-a-deal-at-any-cost side of Obama that infuriates his party's
progressives." Wednesday, "some liberals could barely hide their
sense of betrayal that the White House and congressional
Democrats have been willing to cut deals and water down what
they consider the ideal vision of reform.
National
Underwriter Life and Health (12/17, Postal) reports that
officials of the National Association of Health Underwriters and
the American Benefits Council say the "Senate is ignoring the
interests of the current employer-based healthcare insurance
system in its draft of reform legislation. ... 'If the bill
passes in its present form, jobs will be lost or not offered,
particularly in the lower-income levels,'" NAHU VP John Greene
said. "In a letter to all members of the Senate," ABC President
James Klein voiced concerns about a provision that calls for a
"tax on retiree drug subsidies as well as provision imposing
annual taxes on insurers, self-insured plans" and other
providers. Klein also asked that the tax on "Cadillac plans be
made fairer and 'less disruptive.'"
The Wall Street Journal
(12/17, A8, Adamy, subscription required) reports on a Wall
Street Journal/NBC News poll which found that 44% of Americans
polled would rather no healthcare reform be passed than the
current one. Forty-one percent feel it is better to pass the
plan. Two months ago, 45% wanted the bill to pass while 39%
opposed any bill. Those who have grown less supportive of the
plan include the uninsured, the Journal noted.
The Washington Post (12/17,
Hilzenrath) reports, "The Senate healthcare bill could enable
insurers to avoid some of the strongest consumer protections and
benefit requirements adopted by state governments," because it
"would allow insurers to sell policies across state lines,
subject to the laws and regulations in a state of the insurers'
choosing, 31 Democratic House members said in a letter Tuesday
to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid (D-NV)." Opponents say it would lead to "a race to
the bottom in insurance regulation," but supporters of
"interstate compacts for the sale of insurance," argue that they
"could increase competition and reduce premiums." Also, the bill
"would put some hurdles in the way of any 'race to the bottom,'"
by requiring that states "join interstate compacts only by
enacting a state law."
Learn how easy and convenient shopping for health insurance can be. Get your
free health insurance online quotes today!! |
|
| |
|
|
|