|
| |
|
|
| |
Why The Senate Will
Take it Slow |
|
| |
Right now, all eyes in
Washington are focused the U.S. Senate and how it will proceed
on health care reform. While it’s still anyone’s guess how the
resulting legislation will shake out, one thing is very clear:
Action in the Senate will be much slower than in the House.
Over the past few days, Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has indicated publicly that the Senate
will begin to consider health care legislation on the floor next
week. And he did take a procedural step this week to do so by
initiating the Senate Rule 14 process on the House-passed reform
measure, H.R. 3962. However, just because the procedure was
begun does not necessarily mean the Senate will take up the
House bill next week or any merged bill next week. It just means
that the House bill will be available on the legislative
calendar after its second reading on Tuesday, November 17.
Since all revenue-related measures must
originate in the House of Representatives, Senator Reid was
always going to have to use a shell bill from the House in order
to proceed on health care reform. Now that the House has
passed its version, Reid can use that measure as his shell. The
shell bill then will be fully substituted by the merged Senate
health care bill.
Regarding that merged bill, Reid is still
waiting on a final score from the Congressional Budget Office
and the bill still needs to be drafted in actual legislative
language. Furthermore, the Senate still has to complete a
military appropriations measure and a cloture motion has been
filed on a 7th Circuit judicial nomination. In order to begin
consideration of the health care bill next week, Senator Reid
would have to get a unanimous consent agreement to skip those
measures. Assuming at least one senator will oppose, he will
then have to file a cloture motion on Tuesday, meaning the vote
on the motion to proceed to the health care bill could not occur
until, at the earliest, Thursday morning. If all 30 hours of
post-cloture debate is used (a possibility that seems extremely
likely), the motion to proceed wouldn’t be adopted until Friday
afternoon. That would be the earliest Sen. Reid could offer the
actual Senate bill as a substitute amendment, assuming the bill
is ready by that time. Also, keep in mind next Friday is the
Friday before the week-long Senate Thanksgiving recess, which
also plays a role in timing.
Once the Senate bill is actually ready to
bring to the floor, which in all likelihood will not happen
until the week after Thanksgiving (beginning November 30), due
to vastly different House and Senate rules, the bill will still
proceed very slowly through the Senate. It could take weeks or
even months to be brought up for a vote.
Here’s a run-through of how it would work, for which NAHU
heavily credits the
New Republic:
The first hurdle Reid will have to clear is
getting the 60 votes he needs to prevent a filibuster on a
“motion to proceed.” While normally this would be a
non-controversial procedural step, in this case key moderates
have been slow to promise their votes and are seeking key
assurances and changes to the bill before they will vote to move
forward. For example, Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) is refusing to
support bringing a Senate bill to the floor at all if it does
not initially include a provision protecting against public
financing of abortion like the Stupak amendment that was added
to H.R. 3962.
Once the bill comes to the floor, it must
adhere to all of the budget caps and spending limits in the
budget resolution passed this spring. If it does not, a
Republican could raise a “point of order” and again 60 votes
would be required to continue debating the measure.
Then the floor amendment process will begin
and, unlike in the House, the Senate Democratic leadership has
very limited ability to control what amendments are brought to
the floor. Consequently, the GOP is expected to raise hundreds
of messaging amendments on things like the public plan, the
employer mandate, coverage for undocumented immigrants,
financing of abortion, medical liability reform and more,
forcing Democrats to take votes on
tough political issues. In
addition, the GOP can decide to filibuster any Democratic
amendment for which Reid does not have 60 votes.
The result will be that the Senate floor
debate will likely take weeks, and could result in some very
politically entertaining scenes on C-SPAN. The Democratic
leadership does have some control over the number of amendments
allowed on the floor at a time and how those are voted on in
terms of order and procedure, and Reid can use those procedural
tools to try and thwart Republican opposition. However,
heavy-handed tactics like that may just encourage GOP
filibusters and other delay tactics the GOP has in its
procedural arsenal. Senator Coburn (R-OK) has already threatened
to read the entire bill (which will probably top 2,000 pages)
into the Senate record.
To cut off the floor debate and force a final
vote, Senator Reid has two options. The first would be the
traditional use of 60 votes to close debate and vote on a final
bill, but Reid has already faced threats from key moderates like
Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), who has said that he will stand
with the GOP to prevent the end of debate if a government-run
public plan option is in the final bill.
The other option Reid could exercise is to
try and pass the bill using the budget reconciliation rules,
which would allow for only limited debate and require only a
simple majority. But, under those rules, only budget-related
provisions could be considered, meaning that all of the
insurance regulatory reform requirements like the exchange and
rating provisions, would likely be stricken from the bill as
part of a protracted procedural debate. That means they would
have be considered later in a potential second bill under normal
rules where those provisions would be unlikely to survive, and
it also means that the Senate-passed bill would be next to
impossible to conference with the House-passed legislation.
Also, it is worth noting that many key Senate Democrats,
including Senate Finance Chair Max Baucus (D-MT), Senate Budget
Chair Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Senate President Pro Tempore Robert
Byrd (D-WV), have vociferously opposed the use of reconciliation
rules relative to attempting to pass health care reform.
Assuming a bill makes it this far and passes
through the Senate, it will then have to be conferenced with the
House-passed legislation. By this point, if there is a
Senate-passed bill, it will likely only barely resemble H.R.
3962, so melding those two measures together in a way that that
conferees believe that the bill will pass both houses again will
be tough.
Finally, there will be one last hurdle to
clear before a bill could reach President Obama’s desk: passing
the conference report in both the House and the Senate. The
Senate does not need to have 60 votes to proceed on a conference
report, but once it is on the floor of either chamber it can be
filibustered again.
Bottom
line: Sit back. This bumpy ride is a long way from over!
On another Note:
Cobra Subsidies:
They're Back
The COBRA subsidy
provisions which were enacted last winter as part of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 are set to expire
at the end of 2009. As NAHU members will recall, the COBRA
subsidy program allows for the federal government to pay 65% of
COBRA or state continuation premiums for up to nine months for
employees who were involuntarily terminated between September 1,
2008, and December 31, 2009, through an employer-administered
tax credit program. In the last two weeks, following the release
of disappointing September unemployment figures and the House
action on overall health care reform, there has been a great
deal of congressional attention paid to the expiring subsidy
program.
This past week, Senators Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
and Bob Casey (D-PA) introduced S. 2730, COBRA Subsidy
Extension and Enhancement Act, which would:
-
Extend
the subsidy timeframe by six months (from nine to 15 months)
-
Extend
the subsidy to individuals who are involuntarily terminated
between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2010
-
Extend
the subsidy to individuals whose hours are reduced to such a
degree that they are no longer eligible for the
employer-group plan
-
Increase
the subsidy amount from 65% to 75% of just the employee’s
premium.
This measure is a
companion to H.R. 3930, introduced two weeks ago in the House by
Representative Joe Sestak (D-PA), the
Extended COBRA Continuation Protection Act of 2009, but that
bill does not increase the subsidy amount for employees. In
addition, there is a simpler bill pending in the House as well,
H.R. 3966, by Representative Andre Carson (D-IN) that would just
extend the subsidy eligibility window through June 30, 2010.
Over the past few weeks, in addition to the
introduction of the three bills, White House Press Secretary
Robert Gibbs has stated the President is considering whether or
not the subsidy should be extended, and it may be a topic at the
upcoming White House jobs summit. In addition, House Majority
Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) has been quoted as saying that the
Democratic leadership is considering how to move subsidy
extension legislation forward.
NAHU is
currently reviewing the various bills carefully for technical
issues and improvements to the subsidy provisions that should be
addressed if the subsidy is extended in the near-term future,
and has meetings set with the primary sponsors to discuss these
issues and offer our technical assistance. One initial concern
is the time-frame of any extension legislation. Even if these
bills advance extremely rapidly through Congress, there is a
very strong likelihood that there will be a gap of newly
involuntarily unemployed people that will not be eligible for a
subsidy unless their specific concerns are addressed. Even
though the subsidy does not technically expire until December
31, most newly involuntarily unemployed people will begin to
cease to be eligible November 30, 2009 because the subsidy only
applies to people whose COBRA eligibility begins on or before
December 31. Those who lose their jobs in December of 2009 will
generally have benefits through December 31 and a COBRA
eligibility date of January 1, 2010, rendering them ineligible
for help under current law because their eligibility starts
AFTER the deadline.
Learn how easy and convenient shopping for health insurance can be. Get your
free health insurance online quotes today! |
|
| |
|
|
|